≡ Menu

RADIO REMOTE BROADCASTS and PRIZE PIGS

In response to my blog post about “prize pigs,” a Loyal Reader responded:

“The main purpose of an ‘in-store remote’ is to build awareness of a client or business and the service they provide. There is a core of listeners who apparently think they need every service under the sun but, after getting any free prizes offered and eating any free food, suddenly determine that none of these services are for them.

“You said, ‘Radio is the only industry I know that routinely denigrates its best customers.’ I don’t consider what I just described as a very good customer. Neither do clients. And that makes a follow-up sell even harder.”

When you invite listeners to attend, you do not say, “Please come help us build awareness of our client’s products or services.”

Instead you say:

“Come register to win a trip for two to the Bahamas!”

“Come meet the Morning Crew!”

“Lots of free food, fun and prizes!”

Meeting your client’s objectives is not your listeners’ responsibility.

If your remotes routinely are overrun by the “wrong kind” of listener, then that suggests either:

A) You’re not designing the remotes in a way that appeals to the “right” sort of listener. “Hot dogs, t-shirts and movie tickets” definitely appeals to “Prize Pigs,” and those incentives are wrong for most businesses. Instead, the incentives (i.e., freebies or prizes) should be targeted squarely at that merchant’s customer base.

If you’re at a car dealer specifically to promote mini-van sales, you should be offering something for parents to give to their children. A drugstore should offer free flu shots, blood pressure testing, electronic thermometers. A hardware store should give away an inexpensive yet valuable booklet — “200 EASY THINGS YOU CAN FIX IN YOUR HOME.”

radio remote broadcasts graphicThe problem with following that tactic, of course, is that fewer people will come to your remotes — and most stations make the foolish mistake of selling the client on the quantity of the promotion’s respondents rather than their quality. Seventy-five regular, enthusiastic consumers of books should be far more valuable to a bookstore than 400 illiterate listeners who come for the free movie passes.

B) Your station is selling remotes to anyone who will pay, regardless of whether a remote is likely to be an effective marketing vehicle for that client.

C) Your station simply “throws in” a remote to clinch an advertising sale, without any thought given to whether it makes any sense for the client or for the radio station.

In truth, most clients would be far better served by a well-designed advertising campaign with a built-in mechanism for stimulating qualified in-store traffic than from a typical remote broadcast.

Here’s a good place to start when evaluating station promotional opportunities.

{ 4 comments }

I never thought I’d say this, but for the first time when advertisers are too cheap or too impatient to use radio properly, you still can create wildly successful campaigns for them.

For the first time, when stubborn advertisers insist on “testing” radio for just a week, you can accept their business in good conscience, knowing that you can produce fast, impressive results for them.

It’s with a system I’ll be teaching — with a very special guest — in a live teleseminar next week.

When: Tuesday, January 12; 11- 12:30PM (Pacific) 2PM – 3:30PM (Eastern)

Radio station? Ad agency? Advertiser? Production house? Especially in today’s economy, this is something you’ll be very happy to have in your radio advertising toolbox.

All The Teleseminar Details

{ 0 comments }

Yesterday I conducted an impromptu, live video chat with a few dozen Facebook friends and Twitter followers.

Because already I had received lots of feedback regarding my “man on the street” test of Budweiser’s “Real Men of Genius” radio advertising campaign, I decided to share this ironic twist to the 10th and final interview.

Here’s a rather raw recording of that portion of the live video chat.

{ 0 comments }
real men of genius radio advertising graphic

One of 10 Interview Subjects

For more than a decade, Bud Light has been running its “Real Men of Genius” campaign. (Originally it was called “Real American Heroes.”)

Every year it wins big advertising awards — despite my contention that it’s a lame, ineffective campaign.

“Lame” refers to the ultimate brand impact on the targeted consumer, not to the quality of the humor. Whether you or I think the spots are funny is irrelevant.

Unless, of course, you’re a Big Ad Agency that covets awards. Unfortunately, the surest way to win a radio advertising award is to create an entertaining commercial.

“Did it make money for the advertiser?”

Who cares?

Why For Years I’ve Labeled This A Lousy Ad Campaign

Bud Light has done some very good broadcast advertising.

And some lousy advertising.

I contend that the “Real Men of Genius” campaign is lousy because although many people find it entertaining, the entertainment has nothing to do with the advertiser.

You could substitute any product or service for “Bud Light” without weakening the humor — which is the hallmark of a bad “humorous” ad campaign.

Why This Bothers Me So Much

First, I dislike bad advertising, which I consider to be a form of malpractice.

Second, it’s having a harmful effect on the entire radio advertising industry. Each year this campaign is held up as a paragon of effective use of the medium. Other advertisers are encouraged to follow suit with their own “creative” commercials that do nothing to sell the product or service.

But Maybe I’m Wrong?

I know the campaign is a huge waste of the advertiser’s money. But when a friend of mine — a guy who’s real good at creating radio advertising that works — publicly implied that despite my condemnations he thinks it’s “not so bad,” I decided to put it to…

The Test

I took to the mean streets of Santa Monica and West Los Angeles, vowing to find 10 good men, honest and true, who:

1.  Fit Bud Light’s target demographic

2. Have heard at least one “Real Men of Genius” commercial.

My question for each of them: “Who is the advertiser?”

For a campaign that’s been running a heavy schedule for over a decade, at least 7 out of the 10 should’ve been able to answer, “Bud Light.”

Here are the results….

{ 10 comments }

PSYCHOLOGY OF THE OVERNIGHT RADIO DJ

Back in the days when we actually had overnight jocks, of course…

radio broadcasting graphic

Illustration © 2010 by Bobby Ocean

{ 9 comments }