This car dealer has a long, proud history of horrible radio advertising.
But what caught my attention was not the stereotypically bad copywriting. It was…

Mr. Shapiro (left), Mr. O'Riley
Wait. Let me say it now:
I am not an attorney.
I am not practicing law or dispensing legal advice.
If you thought I was, I’m glad I had this opportunity to dispel that notion.
I considered consulting one of my teams of attorneys, Shapiro & O’Riley.
But until my Citadel stock goes back up, I can’t quite afford them.
I also thought of asking the lawyer who has counseled my family for six generations.

Ugly Umbrella Claim Specialist
But he’s all tied up with an Ugly Umbrella product liability case.
If I were an attorney, I wonder if I would think this car dealer’s disclaimer fulfills the legal requirements for radio advertising in the U.S.
And if I worked for the Federal Trade Commission, I wonder if I would characterize that disclaimer as *“presented clearly and conspicuously so that consumers can actually notice and understand it.” The FTC likes disclaimers consumers can understand.
Or, if I worked for the FTC, would I conclude that the disclaimer in this commercial is *“hard for consumers to understand”?
If I worked for the FTC and I thought that disclaimer is hard to understand, I and my colleagues might decide to *“take action” — as *“the FTC often has” — against this advertiser…
But being just a layperson, I have no idea if this advertiser is in gross violation of both the spirit and the letter of relevant FTC regulations.
*All quotes are from the FTC’s official website.






