A few days ago I critiqued two commercials for a client.<\/p>\n
The client is a direct marketer, so he takes this stuff seriously. (Direct marketers don\u2019t distract themselves with ridiculous attempts at \u201cbranding.\u201d)<\/p>\n
I was typically meticulous in my critique. (You say \u201charsh,\u201d I say \u201cmeticulous.\u201d)<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve never told anyone this, but as soon as I\u2019ve e-mailed a critique to a client, I become a little nervous.<\/p>\n
What if they\u2019re offended? I don\u2019t want to offend people. Especially clients.<\/p>\n
What if they\u2019re so offended they demand a refund? I really<\/span> don\u2019t want that. (I also don\u2019t give refunds on critiques, and no one\u2019s ever asked for one. Still, the concern does cross my mind.)<\/p>\n So when my email inbox included two messages from him this morning, I took a deep breath before opening them.<\/p>\n The first was in response to my first critique:<\/p>\n The second message, responding to the second critique, said:<\/p>\n It was a nice way to start the morning.<\/p>\n Usually I critique commercial copy before it\u2019s produced. That makes sense to me, because that way the client has time to change the copy before going into production. But in this case, the spots had been written and recorded.<\/p>\n One hour and 16 minutes after I received the client\u2019s second \u201cwow, thanks!\u201d response, I received a very long email from someone I don\u2019t know.<\/p>\n That someone appears to be the guy who wrote and produced the commercials I had critiqued. It was a cc of a message he had sent to the client.<\/p>\n It was not what one would call a rave review of my critique.<\/p>\n Two elements of his rant leapt out at me:<\/p>\n 1.<\/span> He defended the use of the lame voice talent (whom I had pointed out sounded like a schlocky announcer who clearly was simply reading the copy he was being paid to read) by saying, \u201cWith our budget, that\u2019s all we can afford.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Ridiculous.<\/p>\n Those particular spots didn\u2019t require a Harlan Hogan. I know plenty of guys (they used a male voice) who would\u2019ve done a much better job for $300 or so.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t know what they paid their VO guy, but if they\u2019re not willing to shell out $250 – $300 for a decent announcer read, they need to adjust their priorities.<\/p>\n (Come to think of it: The client paid ME more than that for the two critiques. And he got his money\u2019s worth. Certainly they can afford a decent voice performer to deliver their sales message.)<\/p>\n 2.<\/span> The email was very long. I mean, this guy was upset.<\/p>\n And Then I Did Something Very, Very Smart.<\/p>\n <\/span>I closed the email without reading it.<\/p>\n I got the gist of it: \u201cThis O\u2019Day guy doesn\u2019t know what he\u2019s talking about.\u201d<\/p>\n Why read further?<\/p>\n So I could become offended?<\/p>\n So I catalog and rebut his evidence of my alleged incompetence?<\/p>\n A number of years ago I managed to learn not to waste my time responding to hate mail or nutty mail. (To be fair: This guy\u2019s rant didn\u2019t appear to be hateful or nutty. He just totally disagreed with me.)<\/p>\n Why argue with a nut or a jerk?<\/p>\n But do you know what would have happened if I had taken 2 minutes to read his entire attack (or, from his perspective, the defense of his work)?<\/p>\n I would have spent hours mentally refuting his every point. Completely involuntarily.<\/p>\n That\u2019s how my brain works. If I think I\u2019ve been unfairly attacked, my instinct is to defend myself \u2014 even if only within the privacy of my own mind.<\/p>\n But I had other stuff to do today. Why waste any of my sorely limited time (and even more severely limited brain power) marshalling an argument I never would deliver? <\/span>What Does This Have To Do With You?<\/span><\/p>\n Maybe nothing.<\/p>\n Or maybe you\u2019re a radio station producer and a thoughtless salesperson mentioned, while passing you in the hallway, \u201cThe client hates that spot you did for him.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Oh? You mean that spot that was approved every step of the way and now is on the air?<\/p>\n Let it go. Getting upset won\u2019t help.<\/p>\n Or you\u2019re an account exec and the Traffic Director screams at you because you didn\u2019t remind her that she had promised to change your client\u2019s rotation, so she forgot to do it and it\u2019s all your fault.<\/p>\n Let it go. Let her words float past you like a summer breeze. (You don\u2019t bother to argue with the wind, do you?)<\/p>\n Or you\u2019re a jock, and the station engineer (!) pointedly tells you the comedy bit you did on yesterday\u2019s show \u201creally wasn\u2019t very funny.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Should the station engineer be critiquing the air talent? No.<\/p>\n Should you care anything at all<\/span> about whether the station engineer thinks you\u2019re funny or your show is good? C\u2019mon.<\/p>\n Let it go.<\/p>\n Use that time and energy for something constructive.<\/p>\n Why, look at me. The time I saved by not reading and then mentally constructing a devastating response to that email?<\/p>\n I used it to write this post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A few days ago I critiqued two commercials for a client. The client is a direct marketer, so he takes this stuff seriously. (Direct marketers don\u2019t distract themselves with ridiculous attempts at \u201cbranding.\u201d) I was typically meticulous in my critique. (You say \u201charsh,\u201d I say \u201cmeticulous.\u201d) I\u2019ve never told anyone this, but as soon as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-7","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized"},"yoast_head":"\n
<\/p>\n