≡ Menu

CAN A RADIO STATION’S LOYALTY PROGRAM HURT ITS PROGRAMMING?

radio programming graphicDuring Mike McVay’s Radio Programming Secrets teleseminar, someone asked:

Many stations use loyalty programs through their websites to engage listeners. How effective is this as it relates to ratings, and how much on-air time should be devoted to promoting it?

McVay: I have worked with loyalty programs in a number of markets, and I like them very much. The problem is that some radio stations get so hung up overpromoting them that it becomes white noise.

In Atlanta, the radio station we worked with for a long time had its own loyalty program. The syndicator who sold it to them sold it to them with:

“You’ve got to promote this two times an hour, every hour. And all the contests you do and everything you do on the air should run through the station’s website.”

Well, at some point, if it becomes fully about promoting the website, you are alienating a part of your audience.

Now, let me interrupt myself. I have zero problem with promoting a website, and I think you should use your radio station to promote your website.

But if there’s never a “call in to win,” if there’s never a connection between “I’m listening to the radio” and “I call the radio station,” then you’ve lost that connectivity that’s always been a direct stream with the listener.

So my suggestion would be to use the loyalty program to reward listeners for listening longer, but don’t make it so overwhelming on the air that it clutters the programming and decreases time spent listening.

Don’t make it so intrusive that it irritates the listener. Don’t make it so frequent that it becomes white noise and it loses its effectiveness.

O’Day: It shouldn’t be competing with the station’s on-air programming. It should simply be another interesting thing that is being shared with the audience.

McVay: Yeah. This is the frequent flyer program. I use my frequent flyer number when I book my plane ticket.

I get to the airport, and I use my frequent flyer number to get my seat assignment out of the computer. When I get on the airline, they announce that frequent flyers will earn 1,000 miles today. And they tell people how their frequent flyers sign up. When I fly enough, I can get free tickets or I can use that mileage for hotel stays or other prizes.

I don’t have someone tell me two times an hour during my 5-hour flight to L.A. how many miles I’m getting for flying to L.A. that day.

O’Day: If you’re taking a nap, they don’t awaken you to ask if you’ve joined their frequent flyer program.

Mike: Exactly.

O’Day: Actually, you know what? A more apt analogy might be: You’re watching the in-flight movie, and they interrupt it to talk about their frequent flyer program.

That might be the analogy for radio, where it actually is getting in the way of the flow of your programming and it annoys people rather than augmenting what you’re doing.

McVay: Right. Absolutely. That’s a great analogy.

Excepted from Radio Programming Secrets.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Frank Baum October 14, 2009, 2:03 am

    appropriate to discuss while multi-mobile-media hub choice connecting is a topic. Learn to juggle with one ball, then two, and on to the extreme you deem necessary.

  • Dan Nims October 14, 2009, 9:05 am

    I would say it’s a ‘balancing act’ in that promotional announcements for anything a station is involved with will take up air time. How much, how often, how loud and annoying, all are a matter of ‘balance’ with other programming elements. It may seem trite, but ‘common sense’ should be your guide.

    Maybe I’ve opened a sore spot though. “Common sense” may be in short supply in this age of consolidation, with decisions made from headquarters. (Am I the only one to notice that too much of radio today is ‘less entertaining, less compelling, with less local content?”)