<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;REAL MEN OF GENIUS&#8221; CAMPAIGN: VIDEO TEST RESULTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/</link>
	<description>Straight talk about radio programming, radio advertising, radio production...Well, you get the idea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoday.com/blog/?p=3678#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>Who cares. It took me 10 watches of that commercial with the car full of guys and the killer whale on the pier to remember it was even a TIRE commercial - I thought it was a &quot;Vegas&quot; commercial because the driver says at the end &quot;now that was a batchelor party!&quot;.

You get even 1 guy to remember it was a beer commercial and it has done it&#039;s job. The point is the commercial is &quot;entertaining&quot; you, unlike the usual serious &quot;look how much you need our useless product&quot; ads are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares. It took me 10 watches of that commercial with the car full of guys and the killer whale on the pier to remember it was even a TIRE commercial &#8211; I thought it was a &#8220;Vegas&#8221; commercial because the driver says at the end &#8220;now that was a batchelor party!&#8221;.</p>
<p>You get even 1 guy to remember it was a beer commercial and it has done it&#8217;s job. The point is the commercial is &#8220;entertaining&#8221; you, unlike the usual serious &#8220;look how much you need our useless product&#8221; ads are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis McAtee</title>
		<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/comment-page-1/#comment-7514</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis McAtee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoday.com/blog/?p=3678#comment-7514</guid>
		<description>Today, we salute you, Mister Beer Commercial Jingle Singer...it doesn&#039;t matter if the beer brand&#039;s market share moves up, as long as your iconic crooning adds more decorations to the display case at some advertising agency...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, we salute you, Mister Beer Commercial Jingle Singer&#8230;it doesn&#8217;t matter if the beer brand&#8217;s market share moves up, as long as your iconic crooning adds more decorations to the display case at some advertising agency&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McKelvey</title>
		<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/comment-page-1/#comment-7502</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McKelvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoday.com/blog/?p=3678#comment-7502</guid>
		<description>For the record, I think this campaign has more than run its course and hasn&#039;t been funny for at least the last five years.  In its heyday, listeners called my classic rock radio station asking for a CD with all the Real Men Of Genius spots.

Dan, I appreciate the fairness in your questioning and agree with you to a degree that the campaign is overrated, but I don&#039;t think this video proves your point.

Because the campaign is 10 years old, I think you need to poll men in the 35-45 age range.  I would estimate that at least half of the people in the video were under 30, although I could be wrong.

I think someone needs to have heard the ad more than once.  Maybe at least five times?  I&#039;ve heard many ads one time and have no idea who the advertiser was.  Maybe the spot was lousy or I just wasn&#039;t interested.  Again, it&#039;s a 10-year campaign.  If someone struggles to even remember the campaign, they probably aren&#039;t in Bud Light&#039;s target audience.  I think one person said he heard it once in passing.

Finally, do we know if these guys are beer drinkers?  If not, Bud Light probably doesn&#039;t care what they think.

I don&#039;t know if any of these factors would change the results of your study, but I think they could prove or disprove your point more powerfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I think this campaign has more than run its course and hasn&#8217;t been funny for at least the last five years.  In its heyday, listeners called my classic rock radio station asking for a CD with all the Real Men Of Genius spots.</p>
<p>Dan, I appreciate the fairness in your questioning and agree with you to a degree that the campaign is overrated, but I don&#8217;t think this video proves your point.</p>
<p>Because the campaign is 10 years old, I think you need to poll men in the 35-45 age range.  I would estimate that at least half of the people in the video were under 30, although I could be wrong.</p>
<p>I think someone needs to have heard the ad more than once.  Maybe at least five times?  I&#8217;ve heard many ads one time and have no idea who the advertiser was.  Maybe the spot was lousy or I just wasn&#8217;t interested.  Again, it&#8217;s a 10-year campaign.  If someone struggles to even remember the campaign, they probably aren&#8217;t in Bud Light&#8217;s target audience.  I think one person said he heard it once in passing.</p>
<p>Finally, do we know if these guys are beer drinkers?  If not, Bud Light probably doesn&#8217;t care what they think.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if any of these factors would change the results of your study, but I think they could prove or disprove your point more powerfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic...</title>
		<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/comment-page-1/#comment-7498</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoday.com/blog/?p=3678#comment-7498</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in seeing the same study repeated with 1,000 interviews...This is a very small focus group...I&#039;d also say that &quot;Budweiser&quot; should be a succesful answer even if they second guess it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in seeing the same study repeated with 1,000 interviews&#8230;This is a very small focus group&#8230;I&#8217;d also say that &#8220;Budweiser&#8221; should be a succesful answer even if they second guess it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O&#39;Day</title>
		<link>http://danoday.com/blog/2010/01/real-men-of-genius-video/comment-page-1/#comment-7497</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O&#39;Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoday.com/blog/?p=3678#comment-7497</guid>
		<description>@ Steve:  Everyone who said &quot;Budweiser&quot; as their final answer was counted as a &quot;success.&quot;

The people who originally said Budweiser but ended up equivocating — &quot;or Coors,&quot; &quot;or Miller,&quot; etc. — were counted as &quot;failures.&quot;

Similarly, the one person who said &quot;Bud Light,&quot; indicated he didn&#039;t have a lot of confidence in that answer, but still gave that as his final answer was counted as a success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Steve:  Everyone who said &#8220;Budweiser&#8221; as their final answer was counted as a &#8220;success.&#8221;</p>
<p>The people who originally said Budweiser but ended up equivocating — &#8220;or Coors,&#8221; &#8220;or Miller,&#8221; etc. — were counted as &#8220;failures.&#8221;</p>
<p>Similarly, the one person who said &#8220;Bud Light,&#8221; indicated he didn&#8217;t have a lot of confidence in that answer, but still gave that as his final answer was counted as a success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

